The discussion about the possibility of a peacekeeping mission has become relevant due to Russia's threats amid a potential agreement between Ukraine and the Russian Federation.
However, according to The New York Times, the figure of 200,000 seems "unrealistic." The head of Ukraine stated that such a contingent of peacekeepers would be intended to support peace, monitor the ceasefire, and deter Russia from further aggressive actions. Yet, questions arise: whose troops could be sent to the front, how many are needed, and will the Kremlin agree to this?
The publication reports that the discussion about peacekeepers will be one of the central topics at the Munich Security Conference, scheduled for February 14-16. European countries, particularly the Baltic states, France, and the United Kingdom, have already expressed their readiness to send troops to Ukraine. However, according to German officials, this issue is premature. Analysts highlight that the main problem is the lack of U.S. participation in such a mission. Without American air cover, air defense systems, and intelligence, European troops would face enormous threats from Russia.
In Europe, there are also statements that they do not have 200,000 peacekeepers available. Even a figure of 40,000 is considered difficult to achieve. German expert Claudia Major noted that deploying such a number of peacekeepers might be insufficient to deter Russia. She believes that an inadequately large contingent could be perceived by Russia as a provocation, potentially exacerbating the conflict. Nevertheless, the willingness of European countries to demonstrate real support for Ukraine without U.S. involvement is an important step in securing their place at the negotiating table.
Source: nytimes.